The last few years have been something of a rollercoaster
ride for FE, with austerity taking its toll on many colleges across the
country. But just before the festive break, the sector got what appeared to be
an early Christmas present in the form of the Skills Funding Agency (SFA)settlement letter.
The settlement itself - which came from Skills Minister Nick
Boles - put paid to many of FE’s greatest fears over future funding. And while
it’s far from a utopia of endless cash, in my view it offers the sector some
real opportunities with a stated growth of 36.5 per cent in the real term spending power of the FE sector by 2019-2020.
Those opportunities do, however, come with a caveat. What was made clear is
that instead of colleges just being given cash, as has happened in the past,
there is to be a greater focus on colleges earning it. It was a settlement
which, above all, gives opportunity, but without any guarantees.
The letter seems to offer up a compelling proposition for FE
colleges across the country – namely, that if we want the cash, we can get it,
but that it won’t just be doled out. One key strand is that funding decisions
will be placed in the hands of those who will benefit from the services
received. Under the settlement that will mean businesses will get to choose
where their apprentices are trained, and individuals will decide the provider
they feel can offer them the best course. It means that colleges will now have
to work harder to sell their courses, bringing a more commercial edge to the provision
of further education. The end result will be that colleges which aren’t
providing the right type of training will ultimately struggle as they’re
started of cash, while those which work to deliver high-quality, community
relevant training will reap the benefit of greater funding.
The funding settlement was full of opportunity, but no guarantee |
In the letter, Nick Boles described it as a “funding
settlement to enable profound change to our system of further education”
stating that it would put “more power in the
hands of service users, instead of service providers.” It means that
there will be a need for colleges to build partnerships – if they don’t already
have them – with local businesses, strengthening their ties to the local
economy so that they can adapt and respond to a changing skills landscape. The
colleges which will thrive in this new funding regime are those which are
adaptable and can appeal to their service users. It’s certainly won’t be easy
for colleges being asked to react to this ‘profound change’ to FE, and for many
it may prove near enough impossible. But that demand for change isn’t
necessarily a bad thing. History is littered with examples of some of the
finest innovation in a variety of sectors during the toughest times, with the
strongest organisations managing to forge a path even during lean periods. The
FE sector may, as a result of this settlement, see some colleges begin to take
the opportunity to really innovate in what they deliver to ensure they provide
those local service users with what they want and need. We are always seeing providers
react to changes and taking advantage of new opportunities which have opened
up, with many thriving.
So as we march into 2016, it’s time to see FE start making
these changes, embracing the new systems in place, innovating and ultimately
remaining a driving force for our local communities and the engine room of
their economies.
It is so difficult to continue science education in developing countries because they are not provide no any latest technologies for the science students and they have to complete their papers without any practically training. pulmonary critical care personal statement
ReplyDelete